... please don't phase me in ...

ForcePanel ForceSubBlock

Small subwoofers try to squeeze 10 pounds of performance into a 1 pound box. Thus, they need to 'adjust' the amp response to provide reasonable performance from a driver and volume smaller than could be considered optimum. The Force Sub uses a 250W OEM amp to power a custom 10" driver and claimed remarkably good performance of 20-250Hz ±3db. The Force is no longer manufactured, but its principles apply to small sealed subs.


Force measured near field performance. 20-200Hz ±3db which is more in keeping with two 2nd order filters of 232Hz. Top trace is level. Input level for nominal 85db listening position. Registered 120db is due to microphone proximity. Bottom trace is Phase, output inverted, and is remarkably good considering the Input Equalizer phase shift. All in, a well designed product.

The Force Amp

Input Eq

The amp has a large 15db @10hz low end gain starting @ 40Hz to linearize the driver and box. Whenever an equalization is applied, Phase is affected. It's important to remember this when adjusting filters as every filter adjustment may require a phase adjustment as well.

Phase Control
The Force uses an All-Pass filter to adjust phase. Input Eq Gain phase shift negates the phase control markings in absolute terms and they should be used as reference only. All-Pass phase controls operate at only a single frequency with varying degrees of shift across the passband. The horizontal bars on the 22.5° to 135° lines cross at about the frequency at which the marked phase occurs for the All-Pass filter alone. The 0° 90° frequency is 2341Hz and the 180° 90° frequency is 4.67Hz. Note that the phase is not constant across the sub's range. Input Eq Gain

phase is added to these values. Filter phase is subsequently added. And finally, the actual driver response. In other words, one might as well adjust the control blindfolded.

Any sub with similar analog controls will operate in the same manner. The utility of a 0°/180° phase switch alone is of very limited use as a 40Hz wavelength is about 28 feet and the phase switch is equivalent to moving the sub 14 feet and no where in between! Every other frequency is moved a different distance. A continuous phase control AND a 180° switch offers the best possible solution.


The filter section consists of two 2nd order nominal 35-250Hz filters, 39-232Hz for installed component values. 2nd Order filter phase is about 90° at the corner frequency. Both Level and Phase are cumulative, thus by careful adjustment of the two filters one can approximate a desired level and phase. The graph shows the combined level and phase response of A 130Hz and B 180Hz.


The graph shows the cumulative input, phase and filter for the overall amp response. As can be seen, the phase, and hence time, response @ 180° is much worse than at 0°. The dotted lines show tΦ in milliseconds. Spica's Servo subwoofer used a nominal 18db/oct filter and was inverted polarity. The advantage of this arrangement is, with the Spicas rolled off an additional 6db/oct, the sub can be placed in the same plane as the mains, summing will be in phase and the total phase error will be the minimum possible. At John Bau's suggestion, I added a hardware Phase Invert for an absolute 180° flip to use in concert with the Force phase, low pass filters and passive XO1.


Small loudspeakers are not known for their stellar low end performance. The Spicas have an approximately 2nd order attenuation below 65Hz. Other small speakers will have variation on this theme dependent on the designer's chosen parameters. The combination of the XO1 and Spica response makes for a quite complex filter slope. Integrating the Force, or any 3rd party small sub, is a tedious process. One would do well to ignore the pot legends and simply think of them as More & Less. The graph shows the predicted response of the Force / Spica combo after adjusting the controls by ear. Better than ±1db! Phasor Vector sum is also with ±1db. Not too shabby.

Control values are meaningless for anywhere but this installation and are presented for academic interest only:

Phase: 30° - Filter A: 93Hz - Filter B: 232Hz. XO1: 109Hz. These values are calculated from pot rotations and nominal circuit component values. They will vary due to component values in other hardware. Note that the graph data is calculated from filter and loudspeaker performance curves. Naturally, actual performance will be nowhere near these value due to room, driver and box interactions.

The Importance of Phase

Some claim that phase is of little consequence. Others counter that minimal phase error contributes to more satisfying reproduction than frequency response. Sadly, a great many HiFi aficionados have never seen the inside of a great concert hall with world class performers. Far too much live music today is needlessly amplified. The microphone, equalization, amplification and reproduction totally destroys any semblance of phase coherence. At a recent performance of a military brass jazz band, there were 25 mics for 20 performers. The result? A gigantic bucket of mush from direct and reinforced sound. The ride cymbal was "an atonal poinky splat!" Instruments wandered about due to comb filtering of the direct and reproduced sound. Listeners are further conditioned to phase incoherence by Lossy Encoding. See Why Lossy Encoding Sounds Bad. The proof of the pudding is in the eating and when knowledgeable listeners make comments like "Those little speakers aren't putting out all that gorgeous bass", "Every other subwoofer I've heard just boomed" and "Man, your system is so precise!" indicate that attention to minimum phase error pays very audible dividends.


Phase 0° Phase 90° Phase 180°
MinVector MinVector+3Ft MinVector-3Ft

The top row shows the effect phase settings of 0°, 90° and 180° with inverted polarity. The second row shows the optimum setting of 34° and about 4 inch offset from the mains. The other two images show the effect of moving the sub forward and backward 3 feet. Note how very little effect this has. Note that ALL images have next to ZERO effect on the level.

In an actual room, boundary effects would modify the response curves, affecting sub and main frequencies similarly.


Before beginning, realize that the ROOM is likely to be the limiting factor!


This Loudspeakers Calculator at Dr J. Hunecke's Room Acoustics is well worth a visit. Sub placement has an enormous contribution to integration and the calculator allows for virtual positioning. Additionally, furniture and room treatments make a large contribution to integration. The calculator allows some limited flexibility in room shape and treatments, but only ported subs. Additionally, the placement tool only works with rectangular rooms. Sadly, WAF often precludes locating and treating optimally.

Integrating a sub 'by the numbers' can be an exercise in futility because the expected control adjustment is compromised by other control interactions. It is possible to get excellent performance if one works slowly with very small adjustments of a single control and knowledge of what is actually happening. An educated ear is every bit as good as the best test equipment. Manufacturers would do well to provide accurately calibrated controls, level and phase information to make integration easier.

Good program material and experiencing acoustic performances in good halls makes set up easier. A good program for getting a subwoofer in the ballpark quickly is a good outdoor recording of a Pipe and Drum band. The bass drum fundamental is low enough to adequately excite the sub. The pipes and drum snares are well out the bass drum region. The music is not overly dense and allow adjustment changes to be heard quickly. Once the mains are properly set up, start by setting 1st filter to the minimum and the 2nd filter, if fit, to the maximum frequencies. Raise the 1st filter until the bass drum is nicely filled. Now adjust the phase slowly until the bass drum snaps into focus. The pipes and snares will also tighten up as the optimum phase is achieved. Iteratively adjust the filter and phase for the most satisfying presentation. If fit, the 2nd filter may offer some additional trimming in the crossover region. Try raising and lowering the 1st filter a little and dialing down the 2nd to see if the integration improves. Remember, any filter adjustment will likely require a concomitant phase adjustment. It's important to adjust in very small increments, a knob rotation of 10° or less. Once in the ballpark, listen to a wide range of material to make final adjustments, preferably over several days, making notes all the while. When the filter and phase are correct, the low end should be detailed and seamless with no impression of a subwoofer at all. On well recorded orchestral music, one should get the impression of the hall stage all the way to the lowest frequencies. If there is too much low end, the stage will collapse between the mains somewhere in the mids. Not enough, and the orchestra floats between the mains without support. On well recorded pop, the foot should be solid and hefty but not at the expense of the snare. Bass should be detailed and localizable. If the foot is too puffy and the snare lacks heft, the corner frequency is too low and / or the phase is incorrect. If the bass is woolly, try adjusting phase. Getting the phase right is as, if not more, important than filter frequency. When the phase is wrong, the low end is a bowl of sonic spaghetti. It's difficult to determine where instrument voices begin and end. When phase is correct, orchestral sections tighten and don't wander as instruments play throughout their ranges. On well recorded pop, multi-miking, double tracking and the multitude of echo and effects devices all become annoyingly obvious.